[1]张潇月,鱼舜尧,李婷婷,等.金马河温江段河岸带不同生境下草本植物多样性和植物区系与土壤环境因子的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2019,25(04):838-844.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.10017]
ZHANG Xiaoyue,YU Shunyao,LI Tingting,et al.Relationship between species diversity, flora, and soil environmental factors of the herb community in different habitats in the Wenjiang Section of the Jinma River[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2019,25(04):838-844.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.10017]
点击复制
金马河温江段河岸带不同生境下草本植物多样性和植物区系与土壤环境因子的关系
ZHANG Xiaoyue,YU Shunyao,LI Tingting,et al.Relationship between species diversity, flora, and soil environmental factors of the herb community in different habitats in the Wenjiang Section of the Jinma River[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2019,25(04):838-844.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2018.10017]
《应用与环境生物学报》[ISSN:1006-687X/CN:51-1482/Q]
- 卷:
- 25卷
- 期数:
- 2019年04期
- 页码:
- 838-844
- 栏目:
- 生态系统养分循环与保护恢复专栏
- 出版日期:
- 2019-08-25
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Relationship between species diversity, flora, and soil environmental factors of the herb community in different habitats in the Wenjiang Section of the Jinma River
- Keywords:
- habitat;? herbs;? flora;? environmental factor;? species diversity
- 分类号:
- Q948.113
- 摘要:
- 采用典型样地法，根据当地采沙运沙干扰及河岸带水位变化的影响，将河岸带生境划分河滩地、砾石地、芦苇地、斑茅地、沙坑地5个类型. 运用除趋势对应分析（DCA）和冗余分析（RDA）研究不同生境间河岸带草本植物区系成分、群落和环境因子的关系. 结果表明：（1）5个类型生境记录草本植物共35科91属109种，以禾本科（Gramineae）、菊科（Compositae）、蓼科（Polygonaceae）植物为主，沙坑地物种数最多，砾石地和河滩地物种数次之，斑茅地和芦苇地物种数最少. （2）属的区系成分较全面地表现了河岸带草本植物的地理分布，金马河温江段草本植物区系主要由世界分布型和泛热带分布型构成. （3）不同生境类型下Shannon-Wiener多样性指数（H）、Simpson指数（H’）和Pielou均匀度指数（Jsw）具有特定变化趋势，物种丰富度指数（D）对生境变化响应不显着. （4）河岸带土壤pH呈弱碱性，砾石地和芦苇地的全氮、全钾和有机质含量明显高于其他生境，河滩地和沙坑地土壤含水量、全磷含量较低. DCA和RDA结果表明，含水量、全氮和有机质是影响生境群落分布的主要限制因子，而土壤pH是影响植物区系组成分异的最主要条件. 综上所述，经生态改造后的河滩地生境为河岸带最适生境类型. （图3 表4 参27）
- Abstract:
- The riparian zone was divided into five habitat types (flood land, gravel land, Phragmites australis land, Saccharum arundinaceum land, and bunker land) according to the disturbance of local sand transportation and the change in the water level in the riparian zone. The relationship between the composition of the riparian herb flora and the community and environmental factors in the different habitats was investigated using Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) and Redundancy Analysis (RDA). The results were as follows: (1) a total of 109 herbaceous plants belonging to 35 families of 91 genera were recorded in these five habitats (mainly, Gramineae, Compositae, and Polygonaceae). The bunker land had the largest number of species, followed by gravel land and flood land; P. australis land and S. arundinaceum land had the fewest species. (2) The floristic components of the genus represent the geographical distribution of the herbaceous plants. The floristic composition of herbaceous plants in the Wenjiang section of the Jinma River is mainly composed of the world distribution type and pantropical distribution type. (3) The Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H), the Simpson index (H’), and the Pielou evenness index (Jsw) had specific trends in the different habitat types. The species richness index (D) did not significantly respond to changes in the different habitat types. (4) The pH of the riparian soil was weakly alkaline. The total nitrogen, total potassium, and organic matter content was significantly higher in the bunker land and P. australis land than in the other habitats. The soil water content and total phosphorus content of flood land and gravel land were low. The results of DCA and RDA indicate that water, total nitrogen, and organic matter were the main limiting factors affecting community distribution, and soil pH was the main factor affecting the composition of flora. On the basis of comprehensive analysis, flood land is the best type of riparian zone after ecological improvement.
参考文献/References:
1 刘晔, 朱鑫鑫, 沈泽昊, 孙航. 中国西南干旱河谷植被的区系地理成分与空间分异[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24 (4): 367-377 [Liu Y, Zhu XX, Shen ZH, Sun H. flora compositions and spatial differentiations of vegetation in dry valleys of Southwest China [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2016, 24 (4): 367-377]
2 修晨, 欧阳志云, 郑华. 北京永定河-海河干流河岸带植物的区系分析[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34 (6): 1535-1547 [Xiu C, Ouyang ZY, Zhen H. Flora analysis of riparian vegetation in Yongding-Haihe river system, China [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2014, 34 (6): 1535-1547]
3 彭婉婷, 罗鹏, 刘长青, 唐荣华, 潘远智. 运用植物区系质量指数快速评估湿地植被恢复成效[J]. 生物多样性, 2014, 22 (5): 564-573 [Peng WT, Luo P, Liu CQ, Tang RH, Pan YZ. A rapid and quantitative assessment of wetland vegetation restoration effects with Floristic Quality Assessment Index [J]. Biodiv Sci, 2014, 22 (5): 564-573]
4 金慧, 赵莹, 赵伟, 尹航, 秦立武, 崔凯峰, 李晓杰, 黄祥童. 长白山牛皮杜鹃群落物种多样性的海拔梯度变化及相似性[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35 (1): 125-133 [Jin H, Zhao Y, Zhao W, Yin H, Qin LW, Cui KF, Li XJ, Huang XT. Elevational changes in species diversity and similarity analysis of a Rhododendron chrysanthum community on Changbai Mountain [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35 (1): 125-133]
5 武晶, 刘志民. 生境破碎化对生物多样性的影响研究综述[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33 (7): 1946-1952 [Wu J, Liu ZM. Effect of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity: a review [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2014, 33 (7): 1946-1952]
6 周欣, 左小安, 赵学勇, 王少昆, 刘川, 张婧, 吕朋, 张建鹏. 科尔沁沙地植物群落分布与土壤特性关系的DCA、CCA及DCCA分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34 (4): 947-954 [Zhou X, Zuo XA, Zhao XY, Wang SK, Liu C, Zhang J, Lv P, Zhang JP. Comparison analyses of DCA, CCA and DCCA on relationships between plant community distribution and soil properties of Horqin Sandy Land [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2015, 34 (4): 947-954]
7 郦威, 卢振兰, 孔维静, 张远. 太子河河岸带土壤理化性质特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态科学, 2013, 32 (1): 90-97 [Li W, Lu ZL, Kong WJ, Zhang Y. Physical and chemical properties of riparian soils in the Taizi River Basin and their relationship with environmental factors [J]. Ecol Sci, 2013, 32 (1): 90-97]
8 赵清贺, 刘倩, 马丽娇, 丁圣彦, 卢训令, 汤茜, 徐珊珊. 黄河中下游典型河岸带土壤性质空间变异及其对环境的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26 (12): 3795-3802 [Zhao QH, Liu Q, Ma LJ, Ding SY, Lu XL, Tang Q, Xu SS. Spatial variation in riparian soil properties and its response to environmental factors in typical reach of the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2015, 26 (12): 3795-3802]
9 Sanjaya K, Asaeda T. application and assessment of a dynamic riparian vegetation model to predict the spatial distribution of vegetation in two Japanese river systems [J]. J Hydro-environ Res, 2017, 16 (5): 1-12
10 韩路, 王海珍, 于军. 河岸带生态学研究进展与展望[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22 (5): 879-886 [Han L, Wang HZ, Yu J. Research progress and prospects on riparian zone ecology [J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2013, 22 (5): 879-886]
11 夏晓平, 信忠保, 孔庆仙, 张栋. 北京怀九河河岸类型的植被与土壤理化性质差异[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2017, 15 (4): 117-124 [Xia XP, Xin ZB, Kong QX, Zhang D. Vegetation and soil physicochemical properties in different types of the Huaijiu River riparian in Beijing [J]. Sci Soil Water Conserv, 2017, 15 (4): 117-124]
12 殷守敬, 吴传庆, 王晨, 马万栋, 何游云. 淮河干流岸边带生态健康遥感评估[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016, 36 (1): 299-306 [Yin SJ, Wu CQ, Wang C, Ma WD, He YY. Remote sensing assessment of ecological health of the riparian buffer along Huaihe River [J]. Chin Environ Sci, 2016, 36 (1): 299-306]
13 张文丽, 夏会娟, 张远, 孔维静, 贾晓波, 姚懿函. 东辽河河岸带草本植物物种多样性及群落数量分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33 (5): 1142-1149 [Zhang WL, Xia HJ, Zhang Y, Kong WJ, Jia XB, Yao YH. Herbaceous species diversity and community quantitative analysis in the riparian zone of East Liaohe River [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2014, 33 (5): 1142-1149]
14 王烨, 金山, 秦晓娟, 秦浩, 张峰. 浊漳河干流湿地草本植物群落优势种种间关系及功能群划分[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34 (8): 2109-2114 [Wang Y, Jin S, Qin XJ, Qin H, Zhang F. Interspecific relationships of dominant species and plant functional groups of wetland herb communities in Zhuozhang River watershed, Shanxi [J]. Chin J Ecol, 2015, 34 (8): 2109-2114]
15 姚俊宇, 伍炫蓓, 孙千惠, 吴霞, 姚小兰, 郝建锋, 齐锦秋. 林窗大小对川西马尾松人工林林下物种多样性和生物量的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24 (2): 214-220 [Yao JY, Wu XB, Sun QH, Wu X, Yao XL, Hao JF, Qi JQ. Effects of canopy gap size on understory species diversity and biomass in a Pinus massoniana plantation in western Sichuan [J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2018, 24 (2): 214-220]
16 唐香君, 郭亚琳, 樊敏, 王青, 赵丽. 岷江上游干旱河谷区林-农-草地土壤水分特征与数值模拟[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33 (7): 128-133 [Tang XJ, Guo YL, Fan M, Wang Q, Zhao L. Moisture characteristics and numerical simulation of forest-farmland-grass and soil in arid valley Region in the Upper Reaches of Min River [J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2017, 33 (7): 128-133]
17 方露, 李晓宁, 唐香君, 樊敏, 幸艳, 赵丽. 岷江上游杂谷脑河流域林树下线土壤持水性及影响因素[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25 (5): 95-102 [Fang L, Li XN, Tang XJ, Fan M, Xing Y, Zhao L. Research on water-holding capacity and related factors in Zagunao River Basin in the Upper Reaches of Min River [J]. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2018, 25 (5): 95-102]
18 杨文斌, 刘坤, 周守标. 安徽新安江干流滩涂湿地草本植物区系及物种多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33 (5): 1433-1442 [Yang WB, Liu K, Zhou SB. The flora and species diversity of herbaceous seed plants in wetlands along the Xin’anjiang River from Anhui [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33 (5): 1433-1442]
19 吴征镒, 周浙昆, 李德铢, 彭华, 孙航. 世界种子植物科的分布区类型系统[J]. 云南植物研究, 2003, 25 (3): 245-257 [Wu ZY, Zhou ZK, Li DZ, Peng H, Sun H. The Areal-types of the World Families of Seed Plants [J]. Acta Bot Yunnan, 2003, 25 (3): 245-257]
20 李锡文. 中国种子植物区系统计分析[J]. 云南植物研究, 1996, 18 (4): 363-384 [Li XW. Floristic statistics and analyses of seed plants from China [J]. Acta Bot Yunnan, 1996, 18 (4): 363-384]
21 张金屯. 数量生态学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004 [Zhang JT. Quantitative Ecology [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2004]
22 吕贻忠,李保国. 土壤学实验[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2010 [Lü YZ, Li BG. Soil Experiment [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2010]
23 符饶, 郝建锋, 李艳, 姚小兰, 裴曾莉, 黄雨佳, 蒋倩. 青衣江中游河滨草本植物生态位和物种多样性[J]. 湿地科学, 2016, 14 (4): 546-552 [Fu R, Hao JF, Li Y, Yao XL, Pei ZL, Huang YJ, Jiang Q. Niche and species diversity of riparian herbaceous plants in the middle reaches of the Qingyijiang River [J]. Wetl Sci, 2016, 14 (4): 546-552]
24 卢训令, 汤茜, 梁国付, 丁圣彦. 黄河下游平原不同非农生境中植物多样性[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35 (5): 1527-1536 [Lu XL, Tang Q, Liang GF, Ding SY. Plant species diversity of non-agricultural habitats in the lower reaches of the Yellow River plain [J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35 (5): 1527-1536]
25 Helfield JM, Engstrom J, Michel JT, Nilsson C, Jansson R. Effects of river restoration on riparian biodiversity in secondary channels of the Pite River, Sweden [J]. Environ Manage, 2012, 49 (1): 130-141
26 孙千惠, 吴霞, 王媚臻, 张柳桦, 姚小兰, 齐锦秋, 郝建锋. 林分密度对马尾松林林下物种多样性和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29 (3): 732-738 [Sun QH, Wu X, Wang MZ, Zhang LH, Yao XL, Qi JQ, Hao JF. Effects of stand density on understory species diversity and soil physicochemical properties of Pinus massoniana plantation [J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2018, 29 (3): 732-738]
27 吕倩, 尹海锋, 何朋俊, 李贤伟, 范川, 冯茂松, 刘俊杰, 王艺峰. 马尾松人工林目标树经营初期对土壤理化性质与植物多样性的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24 (3): 500-507 [Lü Q, Yin HF, He PJ, Li XW, Fan C, Feng MS, Liu JJ, Wang YF. Effects of early management of Pinus massoniana plantation target trees on soil physicochemical properties and plant diversity [J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2018, 24 (3): 500-507]
相似文献/References:
[1]吴春梅,黎云祥,权秋梅,等.淫羊藿果实成熟与生境的关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2008,14(02):187.
WU Chunmei,et al..Relationship Between Fruit Maturity and Habitats of Epimedium brevicornum[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2008,14(04):187.
[2]王乾,朱单,吴宁,等.四川道孚县芒苞草生境的植物群落结构和土壤元素含量[J].应用与环境生物学报,2009,15(01):1.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2009.00001]
WANG Qian,ZHU Dan,WU Ning,et al.Plant Community Structure and Soil Element Content in Achanthoclamys bracteata Habitats in Daofu County, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2009,15(04):1.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2009.00001]
[3]仝瑞建,刘雪琴,王发园,等.沙田柚根围AM真菌的生境适宜性和季节变化性[J].应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(05):684.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00684]
TONG Ruijian,LIU Xueqin,WANG Fayuan,et al.Effects of Different Habitats and Seasons on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Rhizosphere of Citrus grandis cv. Changshou Shatian You[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2011,17(04):684.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2011.00684]
[4]王丽媛,郭东罡,白中科,等.露天煤矿生态复垦区刺槐+油松混交林下草本植物组成及空间分布格局[J].应用与环境生物学报,2012,18(03):399.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2012.00399]
WANG Liyuan,GUO Donggang,BAI Zhongke,et al.Species Composition and Spatial Pattern of Understory Herbaceous Plants on an Ecological Rehabilitation Site from Open Coal Mining[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2012,18(04):399.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2012.00399]
[5]和润莲,陈亚梅,邓长春,等.中小型土壤动物对川西高山草甸枯落物分解的季节响应[J].应用与环境生物学报,2015,21(02):350.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.08007]
HE Runlian,CHEN Yamei,DENG Changchun,et al.Seasonal responses of the soil meso- and microfauna to litter decomposition in alpine meadow of western Sichuan[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2015,21(04):350.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.08007]
[6]井学辉,曹磊,郭仲军,等.阿尔泰山小东沟林区植被随地形分布规律[J].应用与环境生物学报,2015,21(03):533.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.10010]
JING Xuehui,CAO Lei,GUO Zhongjun,et al.Distribution of vegetation types with topography in the Xiaodonggou forest region of Altai Mountains, northwest China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2015,21(04):533.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2014.10010]
[7]孔维静,夏会娟,张远,等.辽河保护区及其支流河岸草本植物群落数量分析[J].应用与环境生物学报,2015,21(05):904.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2015.04016]
KONG Weijing,XIA Huijuan,ZHANG Yuan,et al.Quantitative analysis of riparian herbaceous community in Liaohe River Conservation Area and its tributaries[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2015,21(04):904.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2015.04016]
[8]孙莹,石锦安,邵小鹏,等.不同生境条件下光照强度对蓝花楹光合色素含量及开花的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2015,21(06):1150.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2015.07036]
SUN Ying,SHI Jinan,SHAO Xiaopeng,et al.Effects of light intensity on photosynthetic pigment content and flowering of Jacaranda mimosifolia D. Don in different habitats[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2015,21(04):1150.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2015.07036]
[9]白文霞,李素清,狄晓艳.安太堡露天煤矿复垦地不同植被类型下草本植物群落优势种种间关联[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(01):140.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.06034]
BAI Wenxia,LI Suqing**,DI Xiaoyan.Interspecific associations of dominant herbaceous plant communities under
different plantations on reclaimed dumps in the Antaibao opencast mine[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(04):140.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.06034]
[10]郝志远,李素清.阳泉矿区煤矸石山复垦地不同植被下草本植物群落生态关系[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(05):1158.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.11013]
HAO Zhiyuan & LI Suqing**.Ecological relationships in herbaceous plant communities under different plantations on reclaimed coal gob piles in the Yangquan mining area, China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology,2018,24(04):1158.[doi:10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2017.11013]
